Skip to main content

What would reepbot say?

Status
Not open for further replies.
delcan said:
You've already posted a photo of your dog? I think? I meant more the tea making stuff
Click to expand...

i did. my dog actually got into trouble last week. or more to the point my mum's partner did. because last week my mum and him went camping along with the dog. and one day they decided to go to this local swimming area for a bit of a swim. except there was one problem: it was in a national park. my mum wasn't aware that it was a national park, but my mum's partner did.

so they arrived there and had just gotten out and looked around for a few minutes when a couple of park rangers turned up and told them in no uncertain terms to get the fuck out of the park. they also fined my mum's partner about one hundred dollars, and they also took a picture of my doggie woggie.
 
Well Reepbot. They are your rules and guidelines and being Editor/Head Journo allows you to bend them at your will.
So far the weekly edition sounds practical. What kind of format would you like to present it in? A gossipy who weekly style?
A straight down the line "just the facts" no nonsense report?
A bit of both?
I guess the excitement will be watching the evolvement of the Reepbot Report from humble forum beginnings to possible Walkley awards.
The forum will naturally provide the fodder. Lack of subject matter should never be a problem. In the rare case it is you can delve into heresay and opinion and literally write your own scripts inferring nefarious deeds of various forum people.
Even outright wrong accusations or smearing people in the interests of creating news will be forgiven as long as you mention various individuals.
Also. Take careful thought in writing your headline every week.
It has to be provoking. A strong first issue is important.
I think I will look forward to reading the Reepbot Report on Fridays just as much as I do the Sunday papers.
Oh. And important to have a feedback section. Between issues which you can reply to or not depending on your interest.
I would suggest early on responding to most to build readership and encourage contribution.
I would love to see the Reepbot Report become a flagship of Forum journalism.
Let the production begin.
920x920.jpg
 
reepbot said:
i did. my dog actually got into trouble last week. or more to the point my mum's partner did. because last week my mum and him went camping along with the dog. and one day they decided to go to this local swimming area for a bit of a swim. except there was one problem: it was in a national park. my mum wasn't aware that it was a national park, but my mum's partner did.

so they arrived there and had just gotten out and looked around for a few minutes when a couple of park rangers turned up and told them in no uncertain terms to get the fuck out of the park. they also fined my mum's partner about one hundred dollars, and they also took a picture of my doggie woggie.
Click to expand...

Not really your offie woffie's fault. Now he's a criminal dog. Or dawg
 
Fuzz said:
Well Reepbot. They are your rules and guidelines and being Editor/Head Journo allows you to bend them at your will.
So far the weekly edition sounds practical. What kind of format would you like to present it in? A gossipy who weekly style?
A straight down the line "just the facts" no nonsense report?
A bit of both?
I guess the excitement will be watching the evolvement of the Reepbot Report from humble forum beginnings to possible Walkley awards.
The forum will naturally provide the fodder. Lack of subject matter should never be a problem. In the rare case it is you can delve into heresay and opinion and literally write your own scripts inferring nefarious deeds of various forum people.
Even outright wrong accusations or smearing people in the interests of creating news will be forgiven as long as you mention various individuals.
Also. Take careful thought in writing your headline every week.
It has to be provoking. A strong first issue is important.
I think I will look forward to reading the Reepbot Report on Fridays just as much as I do the Sunday papers.
Oh. And important to have a feedback section. Between issues which you can reply to or not depending on your interest.
I would suggest early on responding to most to build readership and encourage contribution.
I would love to see the Reepbot Report become a flagship of Forum journalism.
Let the production begin.
920x920.jpg
Click to expand...

a gossipy who style i think. i'm far too close to give any sort of straight fact reporting.

the hardest part for me will be making sure that the report doesn't become 90 percent ykw stuff.
 
reepbot said:
a gossipy who style i think. i'm far too close to give any sort of straight fact reporting.

the hardest part for me will be making sure that the report doesn't become 90 percent ykw stuff.
Click to expand...
I think a good re-direct for you to solve that problem would be having a section in the Reepbot Report as a kind of fun speculation on which forum posters could possibly match up. Call it "Reepbots Romance Forecast".
A bit of innocent fun and a distraction for you to concentrate on others.:)
 
Fuzz said:
I think a good re-direct for you to solve that problem would be having a section in the Reepbot Report as a kind of fun speculation on which forum posters could possibly match up. Call it "Reepbots Romance Forecast".
A bit of innocent fun and a distraction for you to concentrate on others.:)
Click to expand...

like trala and witty matching up?
 
reepbot said:
i don't think i would be good at romance forcasting anyway.
Click to expand...
But thats the point. Your highly unique and skewed vision would probably make your forecasting spot on. You would be able to see the opposites attract angle better than anyone. As for individual posters I cannot really comment on due to my lack of knowledge of the forum cliques groups and adversarial exchanges. But I guess its forecasting so you can take a stab in the dark.
Tuttle and Mooseface? Both enigmatic. Interesting posters. And who could resist the couple nicname of "TuttleMoose";)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top