This is hardly worth doing as it seems you can't comprehend anyway. But it seems to take a few logical explanations backed with actual truth for you to get the point.
Statement of fact based on untruth, therefore by definition a lie. I neither got tipsy nor revealed a crush on anyone, including Inigo.
'Connection' to the Pentecostal movement you say, I have never been a member of a church affiliated with Hillsong, nor AOG churches or in fact any Pentecostal churches. You may try to say that I do have a connection because I mentioned that I had attended Hillsong a couple of times in previous years, but this is at least a manipulation of the truth as I'm sure other can attest what you have been clearly attempting to do, especially in above quoted post, is try to somehow turn my couple of visits into a connection or affiliation that would go deeper than a few casual and non-committal visits and it seems you even pushed this point to the conclusion that I am somehow complicit in the actions or even just in PR of one man's actions who is the father of the leader of one church of which I have never been a member. Manipulation and lies, it's your game and it seems obvious to me, even if you are so skilled at twisting words into lies and even in the same situation make yourself seem innocent of doing it.
You then act all innocent as if you were following my instructions of saving your diatribe for someone else, yet still bringing up the Hillsong thing again, pages later. The reason I think you didn't respond is that you struggle to respond when your lies and manipulation are shown to be such, it's much easier to let it slide a few pages and then just bring it up again in a slightly different way and to claim the victim when reminded of previous clarifications.
