Skip to main content

What would reepbot say?

Status
Not open for further replies.
images
 
reepbot, do you remember the funny time back when Affable thought they were most hated forum member? I don't think even Affable would vote for Affable any more. I think I've locked in a few more clique zombie votes.
 
Witty Banter said:
reepbot, do you remember the funny time back when Affable thought they were most hated forum member? I don't think even Affable would vote for Affable any more. I think I've locked in a few more clique zombie votes.
Click to expand...

I remember that. It seems now you are the most hated.
 
This is hardly worth doing as it seems you can't comprehend anyway. But it seems to take a few logical explanations backed with actual truth for you to get the point.

Witty Banter said:
Holy crap, Bleachy got tipsy tonight and revealed his crush on Inigo.
Click to expand...

Statement of fact based on untruth, therefore by definition a lie. I neither got tipsy nor revealed a crush on anyone, including Inigo.

Witty Banter said:
I consider his attempt to smear me still fresh, steaming and live, given his connection to the NSW Pentecostal movement which has a deplorable history and is busy whitewashing the behaviour he tries to smear innocent others with.

Given el'coopo states she won't stay silent on matters such as these, it's interesting watching her ... stay silent. She's threatened violence against someone for playing a game, but Bleachy's PR for the Pentecostal scandal rebranding is fine.
Click to expand...

'Connection' to the Pentecostal movement you say, I have never been a member of a church affiliated with Hillsong, nor AOG churches or in fact any Pentecostal churches. You may try to say that I do have a connection because I mentioned that I had attended Hillsong a couple of times in previous years, but this is at least a manipulation of the truth as I'm sure other can attest what you have been clearly attempting to do, especially in above quoted post, is try to somehow turn my couple of visits into a connection or affiliation that would go deeper than a few casual and non-committal visits and it seems you even pushed this point to the conclusion that I am somehow complicit in the actions or even just in PR of one man's actions who is the father of the leader of one church of which I have never been a member. Manipulation and lies, it's your game and it seems obvious to me, even if you are so skilled at twisting words into lies and even in the same situation make yourself seem innocent of doing it.

You then act all innocent as if you were following my instructions of saving your diatribe for someone else, yet still bringing up the Hillsong thing again, pages later. The reason I think you didn't respond is that you struggle to respond when your lies and manipulation are shown to be such, it's much easier to let it slide a few pages and then just bring it up again in a slightly different way and to claim the victim when reminded of previous clarifications.
 
bleachy_dude said:
This is hardly worth doing as it seems you can't comprehend anyway. But it seems to take a few logical explanations backed with actual truth for you to get the point.



Statement of fact based on untruth, therefore by definition a lie. I neither got tipsy nor revealed a crush on anyone, including Inigo.



'Connection' to the Pentecostal movement you say, I have never been a member of a church affiliated with Hillsong, nor AOG churches or in fact any Pentecostal churches. You may try to say that I do have a connection because I mentioned that I had attended Hillsong a couple of times in previous years, but this is at least a manipulation of the truth as I'm sure other can attest what you have been clearly attempting to do, especially in above quoted post, is try to somehow turn my couple of visits into a connection or affiliation that would go deeper than a few casual and non-committal visits and it seems you even pushed this point to the conclusion that I am somehow complicit in the actions or even just in PR of one man's actions who is the father of the leader of one church of which I have never been a member. Manipulation and lies, it's your game and it seems obvious to me, even if you are so skilled at twisting words into lies and even in the same situation make yourself seem innocent of doing it.

You then act all innocent as if you were following my instructions of saving your diatribe for someone else, yet still bringing up the Hillsong thing again, pages later. The reason I think you didn't respond is that you struggle to respond when your lies and manipulation are shown to be such, it's much easier to let it slide a few pages and then just bring it up again in a slightly different way and to claim the victim when reminded of previous clarifications.
Click to expand...
I wouldnt bother. He's in one of his phases.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top