If you take two random people, A and B, from a normal distribution, is the chance that A has the cognitive ability to understand B hyperbolic?
 . The fine print definitely says 'consecutive'. The rules say failure means 48 hours of being reepbot's lapdog slave. 'On the buses' discussion, here we come.
. The fine print definitely says 'consecutive'. The rules say failure means 48 hours of being reepbot's lapdog slave. 'On the buses' discussion, here we come.I really want to say keating. But he was still only treasurer.
I failed the 48 hour nice marathon. The fine print definitely says 'consecutive'. The rules say failure means 48 hours of being reepbot's lapdog slave. 'On the buses' discussion, here we come.
I really didn't. Liked Keating though.I like Hawke.
I really didn't. Liked Keating though.
Don't worry. It won't be 48 hours of inigo discussion.
Even so.But he was a hawk.[DOUBLEPOST=1450670207][/DOUBLEPOST]Are hawks natural enemies of mooses?
Agree in principle. What are you talking about?Hearts and minds. It's the playing field. Yep.
You added that enemy bit later.... Didn't you? Anyway I didn't see it before. No, I don't THINK they are. But... I should do some more research into this.Even so.
I thought it would be as she seems to be all you seem to talk about?
Hearts and minds. It's the playing field. Yep.
In the purist extreme, a person who wants a red convertible, just wants a red convertible. Nevermind anything else.Agree in principle. What are you talking about?
In the purist extreme, a person who wants a red convertible, just wants a red convertible. Nevermind anything else.
