Skip to main content

Housemate #5 TULLY!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mooseface said:
Well, nope. I don't already know any if the hms addresses. not interested. no bling ring here,m and i haven't sorted Tully's address from whatever articles. And no it's not info I already know. I understood from your earlier text you wanted her specific address from your earlier texts. Apologies mic I had that wrong.
Click to expand...

Well honestly, I think you're taking it all out of context. It's not like I randomly asked for her address in her thread. It's because people were talking about it due to the article. Nor did I ask for her SPECIFIC address. It was a follow on from the my previous questions asking about the article. If you haven;t read the article, please do not go around judging people who have. People don't read articles to find out specific information, they read it because they find the news interesting.
But apology accepted. I can see how it may have been taken the wrong way. But in no way did I mean it they way you inferred it to be. I'm not that type of person haha
 
stephx said:
Please pay attention to CONTEXT.
Click to expand...



Quote posted by jessy_girl View Post
Yeah, they just printed her street. Her street is fairly long IIRC, but I can't say I blame her being rattled by it, considering it was reporting on a person already breaking in. She has had mixed reactions from the public, so she would at least like to feel safe and secure in her own home.

stephx[/B said:
Does anybody have the link to the article? Or her address?

I can't see any other way, you asked for her address. I don't really care, not an argument I want to have. This is my opinion, if yours differ that's ok
Click to expand...
 
l.a.r.a said:
Quote posted by jessy_girl View Post
Yeah, they just printed her street. Her street is fairly long IIRC, but I can't say I blame her being rattled by it, considering it was reporting on a person already breaking in. She has had mixed reactions from the public, so she would at least like to feel safe and secure in her own home.

stephx[/B said:
Does anybody have the link to the article? Or her address?

I can't see any other way, you asked for her address. I don't really care, not an argument I want to have. This is my opinion, if yours differ that's ok
Click to expand...

I hope you understand context is what comes before...
As I have stated i inquired about the article before hand.
But ok.. we can agree to disagree about the way we define context :P
Click to expand...
 
It may have been in the context of the conversation and technically relevant to the discussion, but you can't deny that you were asking the forum if anyone had her address, surely? What was it you meant exactly when you asked that question?

Anyway, obviously it was a bizarre miscommunication and these things happen...
 
jessy_girl said:
It may have been in the context of the conversation and technically relevant to the discussion, but you can't deny that you were asking the forum if anyone had her address, surely? What was it you meant exactly when you asked that question?

Anyway, obviously it was a bizarre miscommunication and these things happen...
Click to expand...
Hello. Yes sure I can't deny it. But I do believe that people have taken it the wrong way as I am not the type of person to stalk her. I wasn't asking for her address as in her EXACT address, but just the street that was mentioned in the article. Just to clarify, I did not intend for it to be taken so seriously nor for people to over analyse how I asked it.
 
Wow. Last time I was reading this thread it was an argument about Tully cheating. Now it moved to full scale stalking. I cannot leave you guys alone at all.
 
jessy_girl said:
Yeah, they just printed her street. Her street is fairly long IIRC, but I can't say I blame her being rattled by it, considering it was reporting on a person already breaking in. She has had mixed reactions from the public, so she would at least like to feel safe and secure in her own home.
Click to expand...

What does IIRC mean??
 
Hekate said:
Wow. Last time I was reading this thread it was an argument about Tully cheating. Now it moved to full scale stalking. I cannot leave you guys alone at all.
Click to expand...

I think a lot of people misinterpret things. They get too caught up in their BB idol :/
 
I've just watched the 'Ben Returns' file. If Drew was in any doubt about Tully before after Ben's, "You've already won", comment he cannot have any more doubts.
 
BBfan- said:
I wish I could remember what it was called but I can't so you'll just have to take my word for it - I don't think it was about Mormons; it was just a small community of polyamorous people who have more than one partner. I don't know why you think you're the majority... I don't know anyone in a polygamous relationship and I can't think of any polygamous relationships that are present in popular media, so this suggests that they're not as common as you think. Just to be clear, I'm not opposing polygamy - there's nothing wrong with it if that's what people want. I'm just trying to explain to you that most people just want an exclusive monogamous relationship. If you think they don't then please tell me why there aren't more people in open relationships (I mean real relationships, not just 'friends with benefits') and why it's so common to hear of people getting upset and dumping their partner after being cheated on (don't ask me again what I mean by 'cheating').
Click to expand...

Whatever it was you saw it has nothing to do with what we are talking about so put it out of your mind.

I think you will find that most of the people you know are in some sort of polygamous relationship although the those situations may be addressed with varying degrees of honesty.

As you point out it is very common to hear of relationship being broken because of 'cheating'. In fact the probability is more than 0.7 that a relationship will end this way. But this is not a problem of polygamy. It is a problem of the false ideology, the hopeless hope, of monogamy, a state that does not exist on field of human sexual relationships. Once this false ideal is dispensed with relationships become stable and usually last for a life time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top