-
Welcome to the discussion forums. To get posting, register an account.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Isn't 6 up every week too many?
- Thread starter starry
- Start date
Elspie
Active Member
I wonder if everyone will be so happy this week with 6 noms if say someone like Mikkayla goes this week due to the invisible edit. She hasn't been seen much this week past, and if this whole 'munity' (is that how you spell it? meh) is the storyline BB is going with she won't get much of chance to be seen as she isn't amongst that. Only a background player. I understand they did it to get rid of the 'boring' ones but if they are going to have 6, at least find some time to show a little bit of each. For example - don't show more of the Jade/Ed bullshit if neither of them is up.
Chump
Well-Known Member
I actually like it because it keeps us guessing with who's going! I like to be surprised.
Yeah I'm happy with 6 for a little while longer. It means we just don't know for sure. Prob needs to start dropping down semi soon tho
Chump
Well-Known Member
What annoys me more is that they are never finalised. JUST KEEP THEM AS THEY ARE, WE'LL DECIDE FROM HERE.
Yeah I'm 50/50 on that. If they kept them as they are initially we never would have had the fun of watching the Tim and Milk swap
Elspie
Active Member
The answer to why 6 go up each week is simple, like a great man once said.
"It's all about the monay!" - Vince McMahon
I would love to know the number of votes instead of %. Would be interesting to see if this line they give us every week about 'record number of votes' is at all true. But alas, it shall never be.
R
riddim
Guest
i'm fine with the 6 being up every week - it takes power out of the hands of the HMs and means the smart ones will focus on entertaining us...
what i'm over is the save/replace. it's too late in the week, especially with no weekend coverage. it's done it's job, sowing seeds of conflict, now let's just drop it
what i'm over is the save/replace. it's too late in the week, especially with no weekend coverage. it's done it's job, sowing seeds of conflict, now let's just drop it
CASEYBB
Member
It means some people are up every week whatever they do, so there isn't much to play for in the house with other HMs. This becomes even more obvious now there are less in the house.
I think 4 would be about the right number.
God, for an Estelle fan I'm shocked, You watched last year, 5 people were able to dominate the show till the end, they were able to put the same people up, over and over again, Someone like Zoe would never have made it to the final 4 because with 6 people nominated, she would have been up more then once and evicted.
buck07
Bucking the system
I would love to know the number of votes instead of %. Would be interesting to see if this line they give us every week about 'record number of votes' is at all true. But alas, it shall never be.
Based on something Alex tweeted last year, I'm going to guess that around an tenth of the VIEWING public are reflected in votes.
http://forum.behindbigbrother.com/s...deny-rigging&p=1530361&viewfull=1#post1530361
http://forum.behindbigbrother.com/s...ictor-Thread&p=1528167&viewfull=1#post1528167
Shackles
The pen is mightier than the sword.
I agree. It's sickening and annoying. Especially now when we're gonna have like 10 housemates.Yes, I'm sick of it being 6 every week! They might as well just put everyone up each week!
They should make it 4 or 3, just like old times.
Seriously...PLEASE STOP 6 NOMINATIONS!
Oh, they should drop the midweek nominee change. Just finalize it on nomination night with the Showdown winner changing the nominees on THAT MOMENT (after BB calls out the nominees, he can then bring the winner to do the swap in the diary room).