D Space
Well-Known Member
From past experience it’s usually out of those they present in the list yeh.Does it mean the 3 who go are out of that 5, or could it be anyone?
I think the 5 were Nina, Croc, Khanh, Mark and Chrissy.
From past experience it’s usually out of those they present in the list yeh.Does it mean the 3 who go are out of that 5, or could it be anyone?
I think the 5 were Nina, Croc, Khanh, Mark and Chrissy.
Plenty of time to get rid of Nina. I’d go as far as keeping her until final 5, as opposed to players like Mel,Dave, Jordan, Jordie, Michelle etcPity Sam isn't in it for a double whammy.
Hopefully Mark is the main one. After that I wouldn't care much if Croc went.
I don't mind Nina but they can't let her get too far into the game, she's very controlling like her mother.
Ad for next week is saying 3 major players are booted etc.
It showed 5 players. I can only remember 3.
Nina, Croc & I think Khahn, I think Mark was shown.
To be honest her reputation is over rated by a lot of fans in my opinion. She kind of snuck her way through to the end of her first win and won against the runner-up who was someone voted out and had returned. And then in Heroes vs Villains where she wins again she was lucky in the sense that amongst all twenty players she had the longest time between seasons (13 seasons or 6.5 years) so no one was very focused on her in comparison to the likes of Parvati, Cirie, Boston Rob and even Amanda who were all very over exposed by this point.Personally though as someone who has never watched the US version I found her reputation much more interesting than her to watch. Had I not known her history she'd have just been another obvious early boot. For me Nina is much more interesting to watch as at least her strategy is to play, not sit on the sidelines.
She is a good character, but really isn't the Queen of Survivor. That title belongs to Parvati.To be honest her reputation is over rated by a lot of fans in my opinion. She kind of snuck her way through to the end of her first win and won against the runner-up who was someone voted out and had returned. And then in Heroes vs Villains where she wins again she was lucky in the sense that amongst all twenty players she had the longest time between seasons (13 seasons or 6.5 years) so no one was very focused on her in comparison to the likes of Parvati, Cirie, Boston Rob and even Amanda who were all very over exposed by this point.
Both of her winning games are very lacklustre, she is more just a very fun character. Her 3rd and 4th appearances she was in a semi-good position but she will never make it past a swap or merge again simply because of her being Sandra the two time winner. She can't win immunity and with the final 4 in survivor US now having the compulsory fire making challenge she has has absolutely no shot at ever making it to FTC again.
I love Parvarti. That twinkle in her eye, and her ability to wrap any man around her little finger is just a joy to watch.That title belongs to Parvati.
100% agree. Parvati is the rightful winner of Heroes vs Villains and had there not been out of show bias against her she would have been the two time winner. Parvati is the GOAT of Survivor and I will literally fight this until my last waking breath.She is a good character, but really isn't the Queen of Survivor. That title belongs to Parvati.
So true. She is a true manipulation queen. Her ability to spin men silly out of their minds is phenomenal and the fact she wasn't the first boot on winners at war is still puzzling to me. She is still the only person in Survivor history to make it to FTC twice as a returnee player and still has the best track record over a three season stint. She killed that middle era of Survivor to the point of people fearing her for merely existing.I love Parvarti. That twinkle in her eye, and her ability to wrap any man around her little finger is just a joy to watch.
The first time she kind of found herself at the end. She started off in the merge with the majority but then ended up out of the loop after her closest ally was blindsided. She was able to sneak through a few rounds as she wasn't threatening and sucked at challenges. During the later stages she threw her last remaining ally under the bus to spare herself and then aligned with the remaining females to where she was taken to the end as Jonny FairPlay (unsure if you've heard of him) was seen as the bigger threat at the final 3.I take it both times she won she had to be taken to the final.
I'd be starstruck. If she told me to vote for myself, I probably would.Parvati is just so likeable that it's like being smothered to death by kittens.
not true. Lill took Sandra over Fairplay because she would rather have given the million to a mother than to have it disappear up Fairplay's nose.they perceived her as the smaller threat.
It's been a while since I've watched Peal Island so fair, but in HvV Russell and Sandra literally have a conversation about him wanting to take her because he doesn't think she'll get a vote to which she has her iconic "I don't know about thatttt" confessional. He wanted Jerri's jury vote as well, but Sandra was going to be taken by him ultimately because he was not worried by her. For him it was a matter of do I betray Parvati or not.not true. Lill took Sandra over Fairplay because she would rather have given the million to a mother than to have it disappear up Fairplay's nose.
Russell took Sandra over Jerri because Russell sucks at jury management.
She is a good character, but really isn't the Queen of Survivor. That title belongs to Parvati.
It's been a while since I've watched Peal Island so fair, but in HvV Russell and Sandra literally have a conversation about him wanting to take her because he doesn't think she'll get a vote to which she has her iconic "I don't know about thatttt" confessional.
I don't solely think Parvati's loss is due to how she treated the heroes.
If you listen to podcasts/interviews outside the game rather than just watching the edited show, you'd see what I'm getting at with Parv losing the Heroes votes.