Game Who would you nominate? Week 1

BBB Bot

BBB Bot

Moderator
Staff member
This is Big Brother.

You have been called to the diary room.

As per 2025 rules, you have 5 nomination points to use however you choose.

Who do you nominate, for how many points, and explain your reasons for your nominations.
 
I allocate all 5 points to Bruce.

Since he's been in the house he's said very concerning things about women, gay people and trans people. Those three groups are important to me. While he says he doesn't mean any harm, the things he's said are quite harmful. I don't think some one who holds those kinds of views deserves $100,000.
 
3 points: Colin - for both personal and strategic reasons; he'd be frustrating to live with, he comes across obnoxious, lacks consideration for others and plays it up for the cameras far too much - this can be seen as not being authentic and a direct attempt to manipulate the audience, and therefore progress further in the game

2 points: Michael - he's been flying under the radar since being in the house and is boring
 
Big Brother I'd like to give 3 points to Colin. I find him insufferable and I've grown tired and bored of him not wearing any clothes. He's extremely conscious of the cameras - which I blame you for honestly for having them all on display. I believe he's extremely vain and manipulative as a result and it's affecting my (theoretical) time in the house. *cries for a compassionate wildcard because I accused big brother*

For 2 points I nominate Holly. I don't believe influencers or people with previous media presence should be allowed to participate in this game. I know there's more than one in the house currently, but it's an unfair advantage to the rest of us because their existing following will vote to keep them in. So, yeah.
 
4 points to Colin: If I hear Bro, bruv, broski or my days one more time, you'll have a bigger scandal on your hands then the turkey slap incident.

1 point to Micheal: I feel he is flying under the radar and just isn't someone I would hang out with on the outside.
 
Bruce - 3
Michael - 2

It’s simple, their values simply do not mesh with mine.

HUP!

But for some people it doesn’t really matter which side of the political spectrum you’re on. Whether you lean towards a more humanist viewpoint or whether you’re a… cunt!
 
Last edited:
3 points to Colin: If I hear Bro, bruv, broski or my days i could not be held responsbile for my actions and his fake romance to save his ass as well shits me
2 points Abiola. Help in the kitchen and quit the victim bitching
 
3 points to Edward cos he is old enough to know better, in all areas. Also he is so fussy, I dont want to put up with him anymore.
2 points to Colin for being a fart machine
 
For four points, I'll nominate Colin. He and Vinnie persistently run around in their underwear. I think he's playing up for the cameras and for the public.

For one point, I'll nominate Holly. She has indicated that she is an influencer and as such, she probably has thousands of people who will vote for her to stay. I realize it is a bit early to nominate for strategy, but I see her as a threat to my game.
 
Tim said:
I allocate all 5 points to Bruce.

Since he's been in the house he's said very concerning things about women, gay people and trans people. Those three groups are important to me. While he says he doesn't mean any harm, the things he's said are quite harmful. I don't think some one who holds those kinds of views deserves $100,000.
Click to expand...
Big Brother: Tim.... you are, not allowed to, allocate all five points to, one Housemate. Your nomination is, not accepted. Please try again.
 
3 Points - Michael - Just cos he's a gross human being, the comment's he's made and things. Stratigically, if he won and he's told them himself the 100k would "buy him a new watch" or "a few mortgage payments", I think that kind of money is life changing for a few of the HMs.

2 Points - Colin - Aside from his nice body and yes it's nice to watch on the stream. He'd be unbarable to live with, farting and cannot stand him wearing underwear, very loud (although entertaining) would be annoying CONSTANTLY and not being able to escape would drive me up the wall, he's one of those "small dose" people.
 
3 Points to Bruce:
Male chauvinist, transphobe and homophobe. A grotesque representation of the Australian “alpha male”. Lacks morals and empathy. Strategically selected by producers to cause rifts in the house. Should not be rewarded $100,000 in any shape or form. Garbage human.

2 Points to Michael:
An overall unpleasant person. No sense of humour (unless it is at someone else’s expense). Lacks empathy. Has basically said that $100,000 isn’t a whole lot of money for someone in his income bracket (why is he even on this show to begin with?!?). He trolls, starts arguments and walks away when the grenades go off. General assholery.

Another strategic placement by producers to offend minority groups and placate right wingers.
 
DigitalCorp said:
Big Brother: Tim.... you are, not allowed to, allocate all five points to, one Housemate. Your nomination is, not accepted. Please try again.
Click to expand...
Hah yeah I didn't catch that on the livestream on Wednesday morning when they nominated. Will update for Week 2 game onwards.
 
3 Point to Holly - Its not the holly show and she need to shut up.
2 points to Michael - We have different morals and I don't want him around me.
 
All 5 points to Conor. He seems snappy and rude, and it doesn't suit his dorky personality. If I were in the house, he and I would definitely clash.

I honestly don't have reasons to nominate the others as of now. Besides, we do need "controversial" types like Michael and Bruce, to make the show more spicier and edgy, otherwise the house will be an eco chamber if these two go. Didn't Gretel say (someone help me with the exact quote): "Vote for who you want to watch, not live with(?)"

Yeah, I contradicted myself. Lol. Except that Connor's rudeness and snappiness aren't even entertaining (like with Vesna, Michelle 07, etc). He is just unlikable.
 
Shackles said:
All 5 points to Conor. He seems snappy and rude, and it doesn't suit his dorky personality. If I were in the house, he and I would definitely clash.

I honestly don't have reasons to nominate the others as of now. Besides, we do need "controversial" types like Michael and Bruce, to make the show more spicier and edgy, otherwise the house will be an eco chamber if these two go. Didn't Gretel say (someone help me with the exact quote): "Vote for who you want to watch, not live with(?)"

Yeah, I contradicted myself. Lol. Except that Connor's rudeness and snappiness aren't even entertaining (like with Vesna, Michelle 07, etc). He is just unlikable.
Click to expand...
Can't use all five on one HM.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top