Inigo Montoya
The New Dread Pirate Roberts.
Sometime humour is hard to pick up on a forum. I really hope no one on this forum has voted more than once. Not a banable offence thodelcan was joking obviously.
Sometime humour is hard to pick up on a forum. I really hope no one on this forum has voted more than once. Not a banable offence thodelcan was joking obviously.
Sometime humour is hard to pick up on a forum. I really hope no one on this forum has voted more than once. Not a banable offence tho
As it's not a vote, it's not illegal to participate multiple times.I really hope no one on this forum has voted more than once.
Appreciate the clarification mate[DOUBLEPOST=1506675525][/DOUBLEPOST]As it's not a vote, it's not illegal to participate multiple times.
Opening other people's mail without their permission is mail fraud, though.
Hilarious, you're too funnylol that's a funny frog.
ribbit, ribbit.
Did you hear about the frog who got stuck in a traffic jam? He got squashed.
Appreciate the clarification mate[DOUBLEPOST=1506675525][/DOUBLEPOST]
Hilarious, you're too funny
I've been keeping away from Facebook, the media, everything, but if I were a person who went on anecdotal evidence I would say its a no vote according to all the regular bar flies that drink at my work.thank you. you are too kind.
i hope this yes vote gets up. all the signs are pointing to an overwhelming yes vote which is heart warming to see.
I've been keeping away from Facebook, the media, everything, but if I were a person who went on anecdotal evidence I would say its a no vote according to all the regular bar flies that drink at my work.
Of course I'm wrong. The hilarious/awkward discussions at work are not a true representation of the broader society's opinion....i hope you are wrong.
no, wait, scratch that, i KNOW you are wrong. there will be no way the no vote will get up. especially based on some flimsy evidence from australia's very own barney, cliff, and norm.
Of course I'm wrong. The hilarious/awkward discussions at work are not a true representation of the broader society's opinion....
It's also exposing the real bullies and bigiots on both sides, which has been interesting to see unfold.that is true. though the government should have just voted this through ages ago. this survey is causing too much hatred and harm in this country.
It's also exposing the real bullies and bigiots on both sides, which has been interesting to see unfold.
This women should be able to post whatever Facebook frame she wishes on without being fired from a gig.
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-...e-survey-canberra-business-ditches-contractor
The church should have no right to fire an employee if they marry the person they love.
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp...who-wed-samesex-partners-20170817-gxy4ds.html
They must have taken notice. After the Kerryn Phelps ad (responding to the "my son was told he could wear a dress" ad), they got criticised for using Phelps, a wealthy doctor, for being so unrelatable to a huge segment of the people they were trying to reach. So this time they have used an "ordinary" family (or be it a well to do one from the Eastern Suburbs lol). Better but not quite there.
Report and ban, that is so extreme, I've read thru this whole thread and the no voter has not revealed themselves... Totally worth banning a poster who has kept their so called controversial opinion to themselves
I didn't vote btw, ripped it up and thru it in the rubbish. Waste of money.
So....same as voting...........well certainly not a yes voter
It's also exposing the real bullies and bigiots on both sides, which has been interesting to see unfold.
This women should be able to post whatever Facebook frame she wishes without being fired from a gig.
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-...e-survey-canberra-business-ditches-contractor
The church should have no right to fire an employee if they marry the person they love.
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp...who-wed-samesex-partners-20170817-gxy4ds.html
The church already has the right to refuse *any* couple to marry as it is. That will not change. It is not - and nor will it become - an issue.If the catholic church wants to refuse to preform same sex marriage I think they have the right to do so