Tim did let her down. Tim betrayed Jade.
I know you're trolling but others might agree.
The alternative is that he then betrays someone else.
The logic seems to have been, even though Ed was hooking up with Jade. It was ok for him to put her up because they hadn't 'known each other that long' or 'weren't as close as they are now????'
They clearly were closer then than how Tim and Jade are now. So the alternative is a loyalty based on time knowing each other.
The logic falls down because of all the people who are original house mates. Jade is in the bottom two with closeness with Tim.
So really she is saying Tim should have voted for the intruders. She certainly wouldn't be advocating he should have voted for Ed. That's the only criteria and anything else is a betrayal. However isn't voting for any of the other originals not more of a betrayal? Due to the closeness rankings. Remember they have been yammering on about group divides all week.
So Tim's only way to not be a betrayer is to vote for the intruders. She however herself didn't just vote for just the intruders. So there's a double standard. Ed also voted for an original
Oh but what could her defense be? She isn't as close with Tahan. Well Tim isn't as close with Jade as the others baring Ed.
There's no way they could argue to being closer with Maddie than Tahan or Drew after the time they've spent together.
So they are being hypocrites.
Further to this, their voting for original housemates was down purely to strategy. They weren't nominating on loyalty and friendship grounds. So why should they suggest Tim has to have those grounds applied when he votes?
It's just a black hole trying to understand the logic of their argument.
Bottom line it seems anything Tim did was wrong unless he voted for the intruders. They aren't applying the same standard to themselves.
Further