Luddite - definition
someone who does not like new technology and who tries to avoid using it
Ha!
Oh Ha!
Talk about the pot calling the kettle back!
I would never ever call someone a luddite!
Never ever ever!
I can't even work the TV remote!
Luddite - definition
someone who does not like new technology and who tries to avoid using it
I have another revelation for you Tra, the saying is actually the pot calling the kettle BLACK, not back![]()
He didn't come across very good. Using in a debate, well a lecture, "how would you argue against X if it didn't exist" would probably get you kicked off any high school debate team. He also made the point of arguing against a straw man and not what Estelle was saying.
Please see my response to ichi. I certainly don't think I'm a genius, nor do my flatmates. We had a chuckle at MICHAEL using a most inelegant word as a supposed genius. Perhaps I, the luddite that you take great pleasure in thinking I am should make myself more clear in future.
Please see my response to ichi. I certainly don't think I'm a genius, nor do my flatmates. We had a chuckle at MICHAEL using a most inelegant word as a supposed genius. Perhaps I, the luddite that you take great pleasure in thinking I am should make myself more clear in future.
I couldn't believe what he was saying - "would you want to drink beer if you didn't know what it was" - he was trying to ask Estelle a question that was impossible to answer to make her look stupid. She had the exact same expression on her face that I did - "WTF???"
But you said: "Unfortunately his clumsiness in using the word prefixed as opposed to the correct word, prefaced", which clearly shows you think he used an incorrect, not inelegant word. And, besides that, I'm not sure how inelegance in one's use of certain words is really related to one's intelligence? Both are acceptable, why should a supposed genius feel his intelligence is at all compromised because he used a word people don't like the sound of as much as another?
Yes I accept that. The irony is on me. I didn't express myself properly! However that is what I meant regardless of the stupid way I put it. Plus you all are reading WAY to much into it. Essentially my point is this: Michael thnks he's 10 times smarter than everyone else. It's rather pompous and embarrassing, not to mention condescending and patronizing to his fellow housemates. I was making a point that if he's such a genius, perhaps he could speak more elegantly. I expressed myself badly, I take that. But honestly, not seeing the bones of my point but instead choosing to rip it to shreds is a bit full on. Jeeze.
Please excuse typos...if I edit them someone jumps n my back, if I leave them, people pretend not to recognize a typo or 2 when they see them. Ya can't win, it's hysterical.
But you said: "Unfortunately his clumsiness in using the word prefixed as opposed to the correct word, prefaced", which clearly shows you think he used an incorrect, not inelegant word. And, besides that, I'm not sure how inelegance in one's use of certain words is really related to one's intelligence? Both are acceptable, why should a supposed genius feel his intelligence is at all compromised because he used a word people don't like the sound of as much as another?
I don't see myself ripping your post to shreds. I see you making a post about Michael using a word that doesn't exist and then, when you're shown to be wrong, you say that's not what you meant. I really don't care, but if you can be critical of a housemate, then surely I can be critical of your criticising them?
I do indeed think Michael believes he is smarter than he really is, I just don't agree with what you're saying. Some of the cleverest philosophers have a terrible command of their language but they still convey some of the most incredible ideas. And, in this case, he's using a word that exists and which works in the sentence. But, once again, by no means is Michael all that smart from what we've seen.
Anyway, as I said, it doesn't bother me, don't read this as me attacking your post. Forums are for bringing together ideas and discussing them, and that's all that is happening here.
But the bones of my original point, however badly written was that Michael can't be such a genius if he uses such clunky turns of phrase.
Is that you in your avatar hellzbellz - if so you are daaammmmmmnnnnnn fine! Smokin even hehe
Ha!
Oh Ha!
Talk about the pot calling the kettle back!
I would never ever call someone a luddite!
Never ever ever!
I can't even work the TV remote!
I have another revelation for you Tra, the saying is actually the pot calling the kettle BLACK, not back![]()
Lolz, me neither!
I don't wanna get into a discussion about etymology but you're right, luddite does mean "someone who avoids technology" etc. However the meanings of words evolve and nowadays it's often used to describe an idiot, or someone who knows fuck all about anything.