Well it really is Season 3 - not including "Celebrity Survivor". But Nine's effort (S1) was truly pitiful, and I'm sure it's not just Ten that is trying to whitewash its existence. Probably everyone who ever watched it has tried to forget it.Glad that LaPags referred to it as season 2, it really isn't a continuation of the half-arsed earlier seasons.
-
Welcome to the discussion forums. To get posting, register an account.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Episode Australian Survivor (2017) - Episode 26 Finale & Reunion Discussion
No, I wasn't, because it colours people's perception of the game, but was okay ignoring it.Anyway, I am out. I had a lot of fun playing along with you guys and @Tuttle (I know you weren't the biggest fan of the forum game but I always enjoy your input on the TV Shows we watch together) and hope we can have another chance to have similar fun in the near future!
I'm sorry it detracted from the focus of the show for you, Tuttle. We did have a lot of fun though, maybe you can play next time, and be involved rather than be outside of it and find it annoying?No, I wasn't, because it colours people's perception of the game, but was okay ignoring it.
You missed it. It didn't detract for me, except for the "c'mon, play" shit. Which was the only part I found annoying. Is it a requirement of participating on these forums about TV shows to be part of a sweep thingy?I'm sorry it detracted from the focus of the show for you, Tuttle. We did have a lot of fun though, maybe you can play next time, and be involved rather than be outside of it and find it annoying?
I voted yes for diversity, btw. I wanted to.
This part was magical. Where the realisation that he won set in. #TeamJeri
You know, you seem to have the same problem my stalker has, my life is not about you.I'm sorry it detracted from the focus of the show for you, Tuttle. We did have a lot of fun though, maybe you can play next time, and be involved rather than be outside of it and find it annoying?
Really sorry I came back.
I thought it annoyed you because you didn't care about it right? Ergo if you were involved it wouldn't annoy you so much, because you would be involved rather than looking at it as an outsider, so thats why I invited you to join in. Not a requirement. Reepbot was not part of the game and never took issue with it.You missed it. It didn't detract for me, except for the "c'mon, play" shit. Which was the only part I found annoying. Is it a requirement of participating on these forums about TV shows to be part of a sweep thingy?
I voted yes for diversity, btw. I wanted to.
Diversity? What?
Meglos
HAVE A NECTARINE, GONK
...and... it's PETER that goes!... lol!... cheers.
Peter did well to last as long as he did, he was clearly weakening to the point of collapse. It was a little disconcerting when he asked Jonathan to help him down and asked for a hug, he seemed very young at that moment.
I think he completely misread what he needed to do in his final pitch to get Jericho to take him. Surely he didn't really believe that he was some kind of masterminf big move game player. That was uncomfortable to watch.
Jericho did the only thing he could do in taking Tara through - she was the more worthy opponent, it was a payoff for her loyalty, and the jury were always going to respect it more than if he had taken Peter as a goat.
Meglos
HAVE A NECTARINE, GONK
All star Family Feud, Monday. Watching it although I hate the show.
Haha, me too. I can't stand Grant Denyer, but I watch the Survivor ones.
Yeah I think in his position he on the one hand has to sell himself to Jericho as "take me, I am beatable" but yet he still has to convince the jury "I'm worthy, I'm a contender". That's got to be difficult to play.I think he completely misread what he needed to do in his final pitch to get Jericho to take him. Surely he didn't really believe that he was some kind of masterminf big move game player. That was uncomfortable to watch.
Meglos
HAVE A NECTARINE, GONK
Eh, so I am reading y'all comments while catching up with Real Housewives cause I'm really not that invested in this game anymore. But I am enjoying the commentary. I probs wont watch the episode so what did Jarrad do to piss all the Jericho lovers off???
I think there was a bit of a misreading of Jarrad's intentions there,
His questioning was in regards to when Jericho voted for him with an underline.
Jarrad said he would now pay him back by doing the same.
What that means is that Jarrad wrote Jericho's name down - for the win.
Well there's a glowing endorsement. Not. Choosing not to participate is an issue?I thought it annoyed you because you didn't care about it right? Ergo if you were involved it wouldn't annoy you so much, because you would be involved rather than looking at it as an outsider, so thats why I invited you to join in. Not a requirement. Reepbot was not part of the game and never took issue with it.
Diversity? What?
Peter, Locky, Ziggy andTullyvoted Tara, the rest voted Jericho.
Ziggy voted Jericho. I saw the Jury Vote video.
It was Peter, Locky, Tully who voted Tara.
Meglos
HAVE A NECTARINE, GONK
Fucking PANTENE PRINCE voted for Jericho. There's a reason I ALWAYS HATED HIM!!!
Bloody Jericho is the winner.
Pantene's finest moment I always knew I liked him.
Meglos
HAVE A NECTARINE, GONK
Ziggy voted Jericho. I saw the Jury Vote video.
It was Peter, Locky, Tully who voted Tara.
Wow really? Not for the first time wikipedia is wrong then.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Survivor_(season_4)#Voting_history
Wow really? Not for the first time wikipedia is wrong then.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Survivor_(season_4)#Voting_history
I just checked wiki. It says Locky, Ziggy, Tully. It is still wrong...
They need to fix it up.
Other than all the Jericho parts, the best part of the episode was this to Tara.
Henry is a good juror. I found it funny.
Henry is a good juror. I found it funny.